Data Cart

Your data extract

0 variables
0 samples
View Cart
RELATE
Relationship to household head

Codes and Frequencies




Can't find the category you are looking for? Try the Detailed codes

Description

RELATE describes the relationship of the individual to the head of household (sometimes called the householder or reference person).

Comparability — Index

GENERAL
Argentina
Austria
Bangladesh
Belarus
Bolivia
Botswana
Brazil
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Ethiopia
Fiji
France
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guinea
Haiti
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Ireland
Israel
Jamaica
Kenya
Kyrgyz Republic
Liberia
Malawi
Malaysia
Mali
Mexico
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Pakistan
Palestine
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Romania
Rwanda
Saint Lucia
Senegal
Sierra Leone
South Africa
South Sudan
Spain
Sudan
Switzerland
Tanzania
Thailand
Trinidad and Tobago
Turkey
Uganda
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Vietnam
Zambia

Comparability — General

Most countries have generally defined a household as one or more persons who live together and share meals. A majority of countries define household composition based on habitual residence, but some use residence on census night (de facto) as the standard.

The definition of household "head" differs across samples. In some cases the selection of the household head is left to the respondent and is essentially culturally determined; in other cases a set of rules specify who should be identified as the head.

There are five general categories for the first digit of RELATE. The first four are for the head or relatives of the head, and the fifth is for non-relatives of the head. Where no distinction is made between "other relatives" and "non-relatives," we introduce a sixth category to emphasize this incompatibility. The general categories are largely comparable across samples. There are some discrepancies, however, and the specific subcategories within each general code vary considerably.

"Spouse" sometimes includes unmarried partners (consensual unions). In most cases these partners are separately identified with detailed codes.

"Child" generally includes adopted and step-children. Some samples explicitly limit the category to biological children only. The child category includes children-in-law in some samples. The child category also includes grandchildren in the 1962, 1968 and 1975 French samples. The Turkish censuses of 1985 and 1990 did not distinguish between grandchildren and children-in-law. The Haitian censuses of 1982 and 2003 do not distinguish between stepchildren and children-in-law. In each of the above cases, the detailed digits of the RELATE code distinguish these categories from those in other samples.

"Non-relatives" are combined with "other relatives" in a few samples.

The data for some censuses are samples of individuals, not households. Although relationship to head is known, only one person per household record is included in the sample. These samples are therefore not suitable for studying household and family composition. See the sample quick reference page.

Fiji 1966, Poland 1988 and 2011, and the German samples, except 1970, provide no information on relationship to household head. The Brazil 1960-1970, Greece 2011, Ireland 1971-1986, Mexico 1970, Poland 1978 and 2002, Senegal 1988, and (in varying degrees) the Hungarian samples do not provide precise relationship-to-household-head information for persons in subfamilies. These persons are all coded to "unknown" or to a residual "not specified" category for related or unrelated people. The Mexican, Brazilian, Greek, Hungarian, Polish, and Irish samples do provide relationship to the head of one's subfamily in the variable SUBFREL.

Comparability — Argentina [top]

The relationship information is consistent across censuses.

Comparability — Austria [top]

The 1981-2010 samples are fully consistent in their categorizations, except that persons in collective dwelling are not included in the census sample. The 1971 sample combines children and children-in-law in a single category, and it does not identify grandchildren, who are included among "other relatives."

The parent/grandparent category was called "ancestor of head" in the Austrian samples, and it may include small numbers of other older-generation relatives.

Institutional inmates include persons in prisons, military installations. nursing homes, and other dependent situations. The unharmonized source variables provide detailed breakdowns.

Comparability — Bangladesh [top]

The census samples do not identify any specific relationship codes beyond heads, spouses, and children. In 1991 and 2001 other relatives and non-relatives are combined into a single category, while in 2011 these are separately identified. In 2001, some households included multiple heads; these second heads can be identified in the unharmonized source variable and are classified as other relatives/non-relatives here. A substantial number of cases had unknown relationship in 2011.

Comparability — Belarus [top]

In 2009, "child" includes biological and step-children. The 1999 sample refers only to "daughter or son."

Comparability — Bolivia [top]

The 1976 sample identifies grandchildren; the later samples include grandchildren in "other relatives."

Comparability — Botswana [top]

In 1981 and 1991, "in-law" is considered to be "other relative, not elsewhere classified", since enumeration instructions do not clarify which specific relatives are included in this category.

The 2001 and 2011 samples have more detailed information: they identify separately biological, step-, and in-law children, and include additional categories for parent-in-law and grandparent.

Comparability — Brazil [top]

The level of detail for relationship varies considerably over time in Brazil, with 1991 and 2010 offering the most detail. Samples prior to 1991 combined some of the categories that were presented separately on the census questionnaires.

Persons in subfamilies: In 1960 and 1970, for persons living in subfamilies, the information in RELATE is limited. In 1960, all persons related to the household head by ties of kinship have full relationship-to-head information (all persons related to the head were considered in the primary family). Persons in subfamilies in 1960 are all coded "Non-relative, not specified", with no further relationship information. In 1970, subfamilies could be either related or unrelated to the head of household. Persons in related subfamilies who are related to the head of their own subfamily are coded to "Related, not specified." Persons in unrelated subfamilies are coded "Non-relative, not specified." Subfamilies are not identified in 2010.

Employees, boarders, and guests: These categories of relationship are treated differently over time. Employees, boarders, and guests are combined in 1960; they are given their own code at the same level of detail as employees and boarders. Guests are explicitly included with boarders in 1970 and 1980. Guests appear to be included in the "agregado" category of non-relatives in 1991 and 2000. Relatives of employees are separately identified beginning in 1980.

Agregado: Unrelated persons living permanently in the household who were not employees or boarders.

Same-sex spouse/partners: In 2010, same-sex spouse/partners of the household head are separately identified from different-sex spouse/partners.

Comparability — Burkina Faso [top]

Relationship data are not available in 1985. Codes are largely consistent between 1996 and 2006. Although a code for parents was included on enumeration forms in both years, parents appear to be included with other relatives in the 2006 sample. Grandchildren are identified in 2006 only, while cousins are identified in 1996 only.

Comparability — Cambodia [top]

Relationships are comparable over time and include codes for grandchildren and parents.

Comparability — Cameroon [top]

The 1976 and 1987 samples provide only limited information on relationship. The 2005 sample provides detailed relationship codes, identifying grandchildren, parents, siblings, and in-laws. The 2005 sample typically distinguishes between the head's biological and step-children. If a children of the householder who are living with their own spouse or children, they are combined into a single category regardless of their biological relationship to the household head; we have classified them as "biological status unknown."

Comparability — Canada [top]

Grandchildren, and nephews and nieces are identified in 1971-1981 and grandchildren or great-grandchildren in 2011, but these cases are included with "other relatives" in 1991 and 2001.

In 1971 parents are combined with parents-in-law and siblings are combined with siblings-in-law. These four relationships are separately identified in 1981-2001. In 2011, parents-in-law, children-in-law, siblings, and siblings-in-law are seemingly grouped with other relatives; this sample also identifies parents and step-parents as a single category.

Only the 1981 sample identifies group quarters residents in RELATE. Those persons are coded as "non-relative" in other samples.

The "unknown" category in 1981 consists of persons who did not permanently reside in the household.

The Canadian samples are all samples of individuals; persons are not organized into households in the data.

Comparability — Chile [top]

Each Chilean sample from 1960 to 2002 identifies progressively more categories of relationship. Most of the category growth is among relatives of the head outside the nuclear family. In addition, 1960 combines spouses and unmarried partners, while all later years separate them, and 2000 separates children from stepchildren.

1970 combines all non-relatives into a single undifferentiated category.

Comparability — China [top]

The samples have generally consistent categorizations.

In-laws are not distinguished from blood relatives in 1982 or 1990.

Child: Includes children-in-law.

Grandchild: Includes grandson-in-law/granddaughter-in-law, great-grandson/great-granddaughter and great-grandson-in-law/great-granddaughter-in-law.

Parent: Includes father-in-law/mother-in-law.

Grandparent: Includes grandparent-in-law and great-grandparent-in-law.

The 2000 sample has separate categories for children, children-in-law, parents (including step-parents), and parents-in-law. However, grandchildren and grandparents are still not distinguished from their corresponding in-law categories. The 2000 sample also identifies siblings and siblings-in-law, which were grouped with other relatives in 1982 and 1990.

Comparability — Colombia [top]

The formal definition of household varied greatly over time, from census family (1964) to private household (1973, 1993, 2005) to dwelling (1985). Yet in practice, all the censuses share a common notion of persons eating, sleeping, or living together. Regardless of the definition of household used, relationship categories were those commonly recognized, usually consisting of a single word that was not explicitly defined on the questionnaire. The number of categories does not vary greatly, although over time several were added to further distinguish persons related to the household head by blood or marriage. The category "lodger" exists in 1964 and 1973, but it was dropped thereafter. In 1964 all relatives except spouses and children were grouped together as "other relatives." The 1973 census added two new categories for relatives that persisted in subsequent censuses: "parent/parent-in-law" and "grandchild." The 1985 census added a category for "child-in-law." The 2005 sample is the only one to identify siblings and siblings-in-law.

Head of Household: The head of household is generally described in the instructions as the person "recognized as such" by the household members on the basis of "authority, age, or economic role." The 1964 census supplied a number of rules concerning who should be identified as head, while other years leave this to the discretion of the respondent. The 1985 census noted that the head could be either a man or a woman.

Spouse: Partner of the head, whether by marriage or not.

Child: 1964, children; 1973-2005, includes adopted children and children from previous unions.

Comparability — Costa Rica [top]

The available relationship categories differ considerably across the Costa Rican censuses. Spouses are only differentiated from unmarried partners in 1963. The 1963 and 1973 censuses identify many fewer relationships than 1984, 2000 and 2011, which have categories for parents, grandchildren, siblings-in-law, and domestic help and their family. Parents are combined with parents-in-law only in 1984 and 2000; they are separated into two categories in the 2011 sample.

In 1963, outside of the handful of specified relationships, all other persons are grouped into one residual category that includes both relatives and non-relatives. This greatly impairs analyses of household structure, but since 1963 is a sample of individuals rather than of households, most such studies are impossible in any case.

Comparability — Cuba [top]

Parents are combined with parents-in-law.

Comparability — Dominican Republic [top]

The 1970 sample separately identifies unmarried partners of the household head; all other samples report a combined spouse/partner category. Children-in-law are not identified in the 1960 census. The 1970 census separately identifies spouses of children and partners of children, while the 1981 census includes a combined spouse/partner of child category. Subsequent censuses include only a child-in-law category. Parents and parents-in-law are first identified in a combined category in 1981 and are separately identified in subsequent years. Grandchildren are identified beginning in 1981. A combined category of stepchildren and foster children is included in the 2002 and 2010 samples. Siblings and grandparents are identified only in 2010. Servants identified in all years except 1960.

Comparability — Ecuador [top]

1962 identifies many fewer types of relatives than the later Ecuadorian censuses, which all identify grandparents, parents, and children-in-law. In-laws sometimes cannot be distinguished from blood relatives in those samples. Only the 2001 sample specifies that stepchildren should be included with "other relatives." The 2010 sample specifies that stepchildren should be included with biological and adopted children.

The "other relative" category in 2001 is large relative to earlier years and probably includes some persons that would have been categorized among the specified relationships (including stepchildren).

Comparability — Egypt [top]

Relationship codes are generally consistent over time. Parents are combined with grandparents in 1996. Persons coded as visitors could be relatives of the head.

Comparability — El Salvador [top]

The 1992 sample identifies fewer relationships than the 2007 sample. Parents are combined with parents-in-law and siblings and nephews/nieces are combined with "other relatives" in 1992; these relationships are separately identified in 2007. Children-in-law are distinguished from children in both censuses, while great grandchildren are explicitly included with grandchildren.

Comparability — Ethiopia [top]

Stepchildren are identified in 1984 and 1994. Those samples also identify stepchildren of the spouse (children of the head) in the source variables.

Comparability — Fiji [top]

The 1966 sample combines all persons other than heads into a single category. Codes in subsequent years are generally consistent, although the 1976 and 2007 samples provide additional detail. Children-in-law, grandchildren and combined categories of parent/parent-parent-in-law from 1976 onwards. The 1976 and 2007 samples distinguish between adopted and biological children; stepchildren appear to be included with adopted children. In 1986 and 1996, it is unclear whether the code for child includes only biological children or also adopted and stepchildren.

Comparability — France [top]

The definition of household and the relationships identified in the French censuses do not vary greatly over time. Grandchildren are combined with children in 1962-1975.

The general categories are fully comparable with an important exception concerning "child." The child category in 1962-1975 differs from all other samples in the database because it also includes grandchildren. The problem is less severe than it might seem because less than 1 percent of children in 1982 and 1990 were grandchildren.

Head of household: Relationships were expressed relative to the "head of household" for 1962-1975, and relative to the "person on the first line" for 1982-2006. There were no explicit restrictions concerning who could be designated household head, but a number of rules dictated who could be the person on the first line.

Spouse/Partner: Married spouses are differentiated from unmarried partners (consensual unions) in 1962-1975 but not in later years. It is possible to differentiate them using marital status in 1982-2006.

Child: All French samples combine children and children-in-law. The 1962-1975 samples also include grandchildren in the greater "child" category. Users can in many cases distinguish grandchildren using age, but we have chosen not to make such inferences at this point.

Grandchild: Grandchildren are separately identified in 1982-2006. They are combined with children in 1962-1975.

Ascendant: The 2006 and 2011 samples group "ascendants" (parents, grandparents, etc.) in a distinct category.

Comparability — Germany [top]

Relationships are reported only for the 1970 sample, a sample that consists of persons not grouped into households. Children are combined with children-in-law and parents are combined with parents-in-law.

Comparability — Ghana [top]

Only the 2010 sample distinguishes between biological, step, and adopted/foster children.

In 1984 and 2000, the head-of-household category includes persons who were identified as "temporary head" in the census. Temporary heads can be identified in the unharmonized source variable.

Comparability — Greece [top]

The 2001 sample identifies many more categories of relatives and it distinguishes between spouses and unmarried partners. Unmarried partners are only identified in the 2001 and 2011 samples.

Only the 2001 sample specified that "child" includes adopted and step children but not foster children. The 2011 documentation refers to biological, step-children, and adopted children.

In 2011, relationship-to-head is inferred from the type of family nucleus and the relationships within nuclear families. For this sample, the specific relationship-to-head is unknown for persons outside the first family.

Comparability — Guinea [top]

The 1983 sample identifies few relationship categories.

The 1996 instructions specified that all relationships by adoption or marriage were to be included with "other relatives."

Comparability — Haiti [top]

Relationship availability changes each year.

The 1971 provides the least detail identifying only grandchildren among the head's extended family. Further, employees and friends are the only non-relatives identified. Consequently, it is unclear how boarders and other non-relatives are coded.

The 1982 sample combines other relatives and unrelated friends into a single category, while nonrelatives and relatives are separately identified in 2003. No information on parents is available in 1971; while the 1982 and 2003 censuses identify biological parents. Children are separately identified from stepchildren/children-in-law in 1982 and 2003. Grandchildren are identified in every year. In 1971 and 2003, the enumeration form the category for spouse explicitly included unmarried partners [concubine]; in 1982, only spouses are mentioned on the form, and some cohabiting partners may be included with other relatives/non-relatives.

Comparability — Hungary [top]

The relationship data for Hungary are complex. The Hungarian samples 1970-2001 provided only relationship to family head, not to head of household. We inferred relationship to household head using different means in each sample. Users may wish to examine the unharmonized source variables to fully explore our decision-making and other data possibilities with these samples.

In 1970, all persons outside the primary family have an unknown relationship to the household head.

In 1980 we know the relationship of subfamilies to the primary family in two-family households. Relationships are not known for persons in three- or four-family households, which are relatively rare. Within related second families, parents/parents-in-law, children/children-in-law, and grandchildren of the household head can be identified by using individuals' ages and relationships within subfamilies.

The 1990 data are similar to 1980, but they offer slightly richer information about the relationship of subfamilies to the head of household.

In 2001, the relationship-to-head is unknown for persons outside the first family. Moreover, other relatives and other non-relatives cannot be distinguished from each other and are combined at the most general digit of RELATE.

In 2011, the relationship-to-head was available only for the spouse or cohabiting partner; children and ascendants were identified using the relationship-to-family-head but only for those within the family of the household head.

Unmarried partners of the head are identified in all samples except 1980.

In 1980, 1990, and 2011, "ascending line relatives" are coded as parents/grandparents, but the category presumably also contains smaller numbers of other relatives.

Comparability — India [top]

The Indian samples are entirely consistent.

Comparability — Indonesia [top]

The 2000 census offers the least detail, identifying only head, spouse, children; all other relatives and non-relatives are combined into a single category. The other samples all identify grandchildren, children-in-law, and either parents and parents-in-law or a combined category of parents/parents-in-law. In 1976, 1995, and 2010, biological children are distinguished from non-own children (step, adopted, and foster children).

In the 1976 census, virtually all mothers-in-law were identified as spouses in the original data. We have corrected the relationship codes for these individuals using information on mother's line number. They are identified by a separate code in the source variable.

Comparability — Iran [top]

The Iran 2006 and 2011 samples identify detailed relationships and distinguish siblings and parents-in-law from siblings and parents.

Comparability — Ireland [top]

The level of detail for relationship varies considerably over time in Ireland, with 1991 offering the most detail. Samples prior to 1991 offer extremely limited information on household relationships.

Persons in subfamilies: In 1971, 1979, 1981, and 1986, only information on relationship to subfamily head is recorded, while relationships to the household head are unknown except for individuals in the primary family. Relationship to head is available in the years 1991-2006.

Visitors: The samples also differ in the treatment of persons temporarily present on census night. In 1971-1991, all persons visiting the household were to be identified as visitors even when they are related to the household head. Thus, the category visitor includes children and other relatives of the head. Beginning in 1996, visitors are no longer identified in the relationship to household head.

Other relatives and non-relatives: For the years, 1971-1981, only subfamily heads, spouses, and children are separately identified, while visitors, other relatives, and nonrelatives are grouped into one category. In 1986, the general code of other relatives in the subfamily is also identified, while related and unrelated visitors are combined with unrelated household residents. The 1991 sample contains extremely detailed relationship codes on related and unrelated persons, while the 1996 sample separately identifies only the spouse, partner, children, other relatives, and nonrelatives. The 2002 sample separately identifies parents, parents-in-law, children-in-law, but grandchildren are not identified. The 2006 and 2011 samples also identify stepchildren and stepparents, but do not identify parents-in-law. In 2011, the non-relative category explicitly includes foster children.

Unmarried Partners: Unmarried partners are separately identified beginning in 1991. The 1986 sample combines partners and spouses into one category. In 2011, same-sex partners are explicitly included.

Comparability — Israel [top]

Relationship is consistent across censuses, except for the combination of parents with parents-in-law in 1983.

The instructions for 1972 and 1983 both discussed how to record a household with two wives.

Comparability — Jamaica [top]

Relationships are generally comparable over time, with grandchildren, and children-in-law identified separately in all samples, while parents-in-law are combined with parents. The 2001 sample adds additional details, distinguishing common law partners from spouses, and identifying stepchildren and siblings. The unharmonized variable for 2001 distinguishes between the children of the head and spouse/partner, the children of the head only, and the children of the spouse/partner only. The category "domestic employee" in 1982 also includes relatives of an employee.

Comparability — Kenya [top]

The household, defined as a person or group of persons who live and eat together, is the fundamental enumeration unit in Kenyan censuses; members of a household might reside in more than one dwelling.

The 1979 sample provides only limited relationship information. The 1969, and 1989-2009 samples are largely consistent, and provide information on grandchildren and parents. The 1999 and 2009 censuses identify siblings of the head, while nephews and nieces are identified in 2009 only. The 2009 census included an "in-law" category; however the enumeration instruction explicitly stated that children-in-law and parents-in-law should be reported as other relatives. We have combined the in-laws with other relatives in the harmonized variable, but in-laws can still be identified in the unharmonized source variable.

Spouse: 10 percent of married Kenyans were in polygamous unions. In such cases, there can be more than one female spouse for a given male. The censuses specified that if the wives in a polygamous marriage maintained separate households, the husband should be recorded in the household in which he spent census night. For census purposes, spousal relations are limited to persons of the opposite sex, despite certain local practices allowing cultural "marriages" between women. A small number of cases were recoded to spouse in 1989 and 1999 samples based on proximity and other information.

Child: Beginning in 1989, "child" refers only to biological children of the head. Step or adopted children were to be coded as "other relatives" or "non-relatives" at the respondent's discretion. In 2009, stepchildren and adopted children were to be included with other relatives.

Comparability — Kyrgyz Republic [top]

Relationship categories are comparable over time. Grandchildren, children-in-law, parents, and parent-in-law are separately identified in both censuses.

Comparability — Liberia [top]

The 2008 sample included a code of "other spouses" for the second and higher order spouses of the household head. These wives are coded as spouses of the household head in RELATE, but can be identified in the unharmonized source variable. Grandchildren are identified only in the 2008 census. The enumeration instructions in 2008 indicate that the category child should only include the biological children of the household head. Other children should be coded as other relatives or non-relatives.

The 1974 census included a category for "mates"; all persons receiving this code were female and nearly all were married. Enumerators were instructed to use codes like "lodger's wife" for the wives of non-relatives and it is possible that this category was used in these cases. Mates are included in the other non-relative category of RELATE and can be identified in the source variable.

Comparability — Malawi [top]

Relationship categories are largely comparable over time, identifying the head, spouse, children, other relatives and non-relatives. The 1987 and 1998 samples also identify institutional members.

In 1998 and 2008, only biological children are identified separately. Adopted and stepchildren are identified instead as other relatives.

Comparability — Malaysia [top]

The 1970 sample combines parents and grandparents and does not identify grandchildren or any in-laws. The later samples are consistent in the categorizations.

Comparability — Mali [top]

Relationship categories were fully consistent between 1987 and 1998. Grandchildren and in-laws are grouped with other relatives. Relationship detail increased in 2009 when grandchildren, children-in-law, aunts and uncles, and nephews and nieces were separately identified. Parents and siblings are identified in all years.

Comparability — Mexico [top]

The definition of household, its composition, and the major categories of relationship are comparable across census years, but the level of detail varies considerably. The 1960, 1970 and 1995 samples have very little category detail; the 1990, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 samples have extremely detailed relationship information. The 2010 and 2015 relationship information is drawn from two separate variables: one variable identifies major relationship categories; the second provides detailed relationship for other relatives and non-relatives as recorded. The original variables are available in the unharmonized variables.

In all years, households consist of persons who habitually reside together, whether present or absent at the time of enumeration. Basic relationship terms, such as head, spouse, and child, are those commonly understood and often remain undefined on the census forms. Beginning in 1970 the basic terms were supplied on the census form, to be filled in as appropriate. If a respondent named any other relationship, the enumerator wrote in the term, which was coded at the data processing stage.

Persons in subfamilies: Although the available codes are similar, the relationship information for 1970 is substantially different from other years. The 1970 census reported relationship to the head of the subfamily (conjugal unit), rather than relationship to the head of household. For example, a married son with a spouse and children constituted their own family within the household, and expressed their relationships to that son, not the household head. The relationship of subfamily heads to the primary family head was not ascertained; therefore the relationship to the household head of all persons in subfamilies is unknown in 1970. Relationship to the head of the subfamily is preserved in SUBFREL.

Spouse: "Companion" was explicitly mentioned beginning in 1970. A very small number (one to two hundred) of unmarried partners were identified in 1990 and 2005, but they seemed so unrepresentative that they are combined with spouses in RELATE. They can be identified in the unharmonized source variables.

Comparability — Mongolia [top]

The samples are entirely consistent.

Comparability — Morocco [top]

Relationship detail increases over time. All censuses identify parents and children-in-law. Grandchildren and siblings are included with other relatives in 1982, but are separately identified in the 1994 and 2004 samples.

In 2004, virtually all spouses of the household head who were older than the head were identified as parents in the source microdata. Using information on age, marital status, and position in the household, we have corrected the relationship codes for these individuals. Researchers can identify the persons whose relationship is imputed as a spouse in the source variable.

Comparability — Mozambique [top]

The samples are largely consistent over time. The 2007 sample has a separate category for stepchild.

Comparability — Netherlands [top]

Heads and spouses are not distinguished in the Netherlands samples, and they are coded together as heads. The data are samples of individuals -- not of entire households -- which mitigates the impact of this situation.

The samples have extremely limited information: essentially only identifying heads/spouses, children, and other persons. The residual category therefore includes both relatives and non-relatives. The 1960 and 1971 samples also identify institutional residents.

Comparability — Nicaragua [top]

The 2005 census provides the most detail, distinguishing biological children from step-children, parents from parents-in-law, and great grandchildren from grandchildren, as well as identifying siblings and grandparents. Children-in-law are identified only in 1995 and 2005. The 1995 and 1971 censuses identify grandchildren and a combined category of parents/parents-in-law.

Comparability — Nigeria [top]

Relationship codes are detailed and largely consistent over time. Biological children are distinguished from stepchildren in all years. Parents-in-law and siblings-in-law are identified in all years, while children-in-law are never identified. All samples identify grandchildren and nephews and nieces.

In 2008 and 2010, some households had more than one head. The second head in the household has been coded with an unknown relationship in RELATE, but can be identified in the source variables.

Comparability — Pakistan [top]

Relationship detail declines considerably over time. The 1973 sample identifies grandchildren, children-in-law, and a combined category of parents/parents-in-law. The 1981 and 1998 samples identify only the five basic categories: head, spouse, child, other relatives, and non-relatives.

Comparability — Palestine [top]

Relationship categories are comparable over time, and include information on parents, siblings, children-in-law, and grandchildren.

Comparability — Panama [top]

The level of category detail increases over time. The 1960 sample groups all non-children into "other relatives." 1970 identifies grandchildren and parents, combining the latter with parents-in-law. Later samples distinguish parents-in-law and children-in-law. The 2010 sample provides information on most categories of relatives.

Comparability — Paraguay [top]

The relationship categories are largely comparable over time. The 1962 and 1972 samples contain very few categories: only head, spouse or partner, child, and other. The 1962 sample has a category for "Boarders." The 1982-2002 samples contain more detailed relationships such as child-in-law and parent-in-law.

Comparability — Peru [top]

Relationship categories are consistent over time. Grandchildren and children-in-law are identified separately, but parents are combined with parents-in-law.

Comparability — Philippines [top]

The data are fully comparable across samples apart from some extra detail among non-relatives in 1995-2000.

Comparability — Poland [top]

Relationship-to-head is inferred from that to the family head in 1978. This sample allows identifying specific relationships only for the household head, spouse/partner, and child in the first subfamily; persons in other subfamilies are classified as "other relative or non-relative."

The 2002 sample has detailed relationships for all household members.

Comparability — Portugal [top]

The 1981 census identifies fewer relationship categories than the later censuses. It lacks categories for siblings, grandparents and stepchildren, which are present in the later samples. The 2010 sample includes separate categories for "Spouse" and "Partner in a consensual union."

Comparability — Puerto Rico [top]

Relationship codes are generally comparable across all years. The 2005 sample does not include group quarters. Category detail peaks in 1980-2010. The 1970, 2005 and 2010 samples do not identify grandparents, aunts and uncles, nephews and nieces, or cousins. The 2005 questionnaire included a single category combining all types of in-laws: child, sibling, and parent. Because of the ambiguity in relationship to household head, the RELATE variable groups in-laws with other unspecified relatives. In-laws can be identified using the unharmonized source variable.

Comparability — Romania [top]

The 2002 sample distinguishes between spouses and unmarried partners and the 1977 sample identifies nephews and nieces; otherwise the categories between the 1977-2002 samples are consistent. In each of these samples children include foster children as well as step, adopted, and biological.

The 1977 sample contains some extra category detail in the unharmonized source variable.

In 2011, only the head of household, spouse/partner, and child are separately identified. Other household members are grouped into "Other relative, not elsewhere classified" or "Non-relative". Foster children are considered as non-relatives in 2011.

Comparability — Rwanda [top]

The 1991 sample lacks a general category for "other relative." It is unclear if unspecified other relatives were grouped with non-relatives, which also includes persons in collective dwellings.

The 2002 sample separates the residual relatives, non-relatives, and group quarters residents into separate categories. Persons who were visitors at the time of the census did not answer the relationship question in 2002. We have categorized them as "visitors" in RELATE, but some may have been related to the household head.

Comparability — Saint Lucia [top]

Relationship categories increase in detail between the 1980 and 1991 samples. The 1980 sample combines all relatives except spouses and children, while the 1991 sample separately identifies grandchildren, children-in-law, and parents/parents-in-law. Boarders, domestic employees, and their relatives are identified in 1980 only.

Comparability — Senegal [top]

The relationship codes are not comparable across censuses. In 1988, enumerators were instructed identify subfamilies (for instance married children). Relationship to household head was collected only for primary family members and subfamily heads. Relationship to family head was collected for all other subfamily members. Unfortunately, the detailed information on subfamily relationships is unavailable in the IPUMS data for most persons in subfamilies including subfamily heads (about one-quarter of the full sample). Instead, subfamily members receive the code "other relative" or "other relative or non-relative". As a result, a large number of adult children, children-in-law, grandchildren, parents, siblings, and nephew/nieces cannot be identified in 1988. Non-relatives are separately identified only if they reside in the primary family or are visitors to the household. Persons in subfamilies are identified in the variable SUBFNUM.

The 1988 sample had a significant number of persons originally identified as a second household head; they are recoded to "unknown" relationship.

The 2002 census collected relationship to household head for all persons and roughly one-fifth of the sample is coded as an "other relative" or "non-relative".

Relationship category detail changed slightly over time. Grandchildren and grandparents are identified only in the 2002 sample, while nephews/nieces are identified only in 1988 and only when they reside in primary family. Siblings and parents are identified in both years.

Comparability — Sierra Leone [top]

The Sierra Leone 2004 census contains detailed information on relatives, including grandchildren, parents, sibling, and nephews/nieces. In-laws were collected into a single-category and are combined with other relatives in RELATE.

Comparability — South Africa [top]

The 1996 sample identifies fewer relationships than later years. In-laws are included among "other relatives" in 1996, but several types are given distinct codes in 2001, 2007 and 2011. Children are combined with step and adopted children in a single category in 1996, but non-biological children are independently identified in 2001, 2007 and 2011. In the 2011 sample there is also an additional category for children-in-law.

Great grandchildren are explicitly included with grandchildren in 2001-2011.

Comparability — South Sudan [top]

The 2008 South Sudan census identifies grandchildren, nephews/nieces and combined categories of parents/parents-in-law and siblings/siblings-in-law.

Comparability — Spain [top]

The 2001 sample distinguishes between spouses and unmarried partners and between siblings and siblings-in-law. Grandchildren are identified in 1981 and 1991, but are included with "other relatives" in 2001.

Comparability — Sudan [top]

Sudan 2008 contains identifies grandchildren, nephews/nieces and combined categories of parents/parents-in-law and siblings/siblings-in-law.

Comparability — Switzerland [top]

Relationship categories are consistent over time. Children-in-law are combined with children, parents are combined with parents-in-law, and grandchildren are combined with other relatives in all years.

Comparability — Tanzania [top]

Relationship category detail increased between the 1988 and 2002 samples. Parents and grandchildren are distinguished from other relatives only in 2002 and 2012, and in-laws are never identified.

Comparability — Thailand [top]

The samples differ in their treatment of children, parents, parents-in-law and grandchildren, and non-relatives. Adopted, step, and biological children are separately identified in 1980 and 1990. Step and adopted children are combined in 1970 and coded as stepchildren in RELATE (stepchildren are much more numerous than adopted in other Thai samples). The 2000 sample combines all categories of children. In 1970, parents are separately identified, while parents-in-law are included with other relatives. The 1980 and 1990 samples combine parents with parents-in-law, while the 2000 sample combines parents, parents-in-law, and grandparents. Grandchildren are separately identified in 1970 and combined with grandchildren-in-law in later samples. Detail on non-relatives declines slightly over time.

Comparability — Trinidad and Tobago [top]

The Trinidad and Tobago samples have varying level of detail for relationships with the household head. In 1970, only head, spouse/partner, and child are identified. The 1980, 1990, and 2000 samples also consider grandchildren and spouse/partner of a child.

The 2011 sample is the most detailed for Trinidad and Tobago, as it includes additional relationships: spouse and partner of the household head (separately), biological, adopted, and step-children, and parents or parents-in-law.

Comparability — Turkey [top]

The 1985 and 1990 census included a joint category of children-in-law and grandchildren. We have used marital status to distinguish between these two categories of relationship, because children-in-law are married by definition and the vast majority of grandchildren have never married. The original codes are preserved in the unharmonized source variables. In 2000, these categories are separately identified.

Unlike the earlier samples, the 2000 census combines other relatives and non-relatives into a single category. With this exception, relationship codes are more detailed in 2000 than in earlier censuses: parents, parents-in-law and siblings are separately identified. The 1985 and 1990 censuses report combined categories for parents/parent-in-law and include siblings with other relatives.

Comparability — Uganda [top]

The 2002 sample identifies step-children. Parents-in-law and siblings-in-law appear to be included with "other relatives" in 1991, but are combined with parents and siblings in 2002. Neither sample identifies grandchildren.

Comparability — United Kingdom [top]

Both samples offer reasonably detailed relationship codes, but the categories differ. The 1991 sample identifies in-laws. In-laws were not mentioned in the 2001 census questionnaire and it is assumed that they are included in "other relatives" in that sample.

The 2001 sample identifies step-children, step-parents, and grandparents; 1991 identifies nephews and nieces.

Comparability — United States [top]

The general code is comparable across all years. Group quarters (collective dwellings) is a primary distinction in the relationship variable for the U.S. samples. The 2005 sample does not include group quarters.

Category detail peaks in 1980-2000. The 1960-1970 and 2005 samples do not identify grandparents, aunts and uncles, nephews and nieces, or cousins.

Some of the following categories posed unique problems due to changing definitions and categories across census years, and they are described in detail.

Head/householder: The wording of the question changed in 1980 and 1990 from "relationship to head" to "relationship to householder." Prior to 1970, enumerators were instructed to record the male as the head of household for all married couples, regardless of the couple's designation of a head. The term "householder" was introduced in 1980 and allowed any adult in the family to be the reference person.

Child: The 2000 and 2010 samples separately identify biological, step, and adopted children. In 1990, stepchildren are identified separately, but while biological children are combined with adopted children. In 1960-1980 and 2005, no distinction is made among types of children.

Partner/friend: This category changes considerably in meaning across census years. In 1960 and 1970, the "partner/friend" category is a residual for all non-relatives in the household who are not employees or lodgers. In 1980, "partner/roommate" refers to a non-relative who lives with the householder and shares expenses. In 1990 and 2005, this category is split into "housemate or roommate" and "unmarried partner," which is supposed to distinguish those with a "close personal relationship" with the householder.

Students and military: People in college dormitories and military installations are classified as group quarters members under "military" and "college dormitory."

Other non-relatives: In 1990 this category includes employees in households, but for 1980 employees are classified elsewhere. The 1960 and 1970 censuses classified any non-relative other than lodgers or employees in the "partner/friend" category.

Other non-inmates: The "other non-inmate" category has subtly different definitions. 1990 has the broadest definition; including people enumerated in military installations, college dormitories, rooming houses, and employees and heads of group quarters. 1960 and 1970 have the narrowest definition, classifying military installation, college dormitory, and rooming house residents and non-inmates in institutions in separate categories, and leaving only employees in the "other non-inmates" category. 1980 has a definition similar to 1960/70, but it includes non-inmates in institutions, in addition to employees.

Institutional inmates: The institutional inmates category is fully comparable across samples.

In-laws: The 2005 questionnaire included a single category combining all types of in-laws. Specific categories of in-laws--child, sibling, and parent--have been inferred using age and marital status.

Comparability — Uruguay [top]

Category detail increases over time. Children-in-law are separately identified in every sample except 1963. Grandchildren are combined with other relatives in 1963-1985. Parents and parents-in-law are combined in 1963-1996, and separately identified in 2006 and 2011. The 2006-2011 samples also identify siblings and siblings-in-law.

Biological children and stepchildren are combined in 1975 and 1985, and separately identified in later samples. The 2006 and 2011 censuses distinguish between two types of biological children: those related to the head and spouse, and those related only to the head. This distinction is preserved in the unharmonized source variables.

Comparability — Venezuela [top]

Category detail increases over time. 1971 identifies many fewer types of relatives than the other Venezuelan censuses, grouping all relatives other than children into one category. The 1981 sample offers detail within other relatives, including grandchildren, parents, children-in-law and siblings. The 1991-2001 samples add nephews and nieces.

Comparability — Vietnam [top]

"Non-relatives" are combined with "other relatives" in 1999 and 2009 Vietnam. This makes these samples different from the 1989 Vietnamese sample and nearly all other samples.

Child: Includes children-in-law as well as adopted children and stepchildren in 1989. Only biological children are identified in 1999 and 2009, while adopted children, stepchildren, and children-in-law are included with other relatives or non-relatives.

Grandchild: In 1989 and 2009, grandchildren are separately identified. In 1999 these persons are included in "other relatives and non-relatives."

Comparability — Zambia [top]

Category detail increases over time. 1990 identifies many fewer types of relatives than the other Zambian censuses, grouping all relatives other than children into one category. The 2000 sample offers detail within other relatives, including grandchildren, parents, children-in-law and siblings. The 2010 sample add parents-in-law and cousins. Stepchildren are distinguished from biological children in all years.

Universe

  • All persons

Availability

  • Argentina: 1970, 1980, 1991, 2001, 2010
  • Armenia: 2001, 2011
  • Austria: 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001
  • Bangladesh: 1991, 2001, 2011
  • Belarus: 1999, 2009
  • Bolivia: 1976, 1992, 2001
  • Botswana: 1981, 1991, 2001, 2011
  • Brazil: 1960, 1970, 1980, 1991, 2000, 2010
  • Burkina Faso: 1996, 2006
  • Cambodia: 1998, 2008
  • Cameroon: 1976, 1987, 2005
  • Canada: 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001, 2011
  • Chile: 1960, 1970, 1982, 1992, 2002
  • China: 1982, 1990, 2000
  • Colombia: 1964, 1973, 1985, 1993, 2005
  • Costa Rica: 1963, 1973, 1984, 2000, 2011
  • Cuba: 2002
  • Dominican Republic: 1960, 1970, 1981, 2002, 2010
  • Ecuador: 1962, 1974, 1982, 1990, 2001, 2010
  • Egypt: 1986, 1996, 2006
  • El Salvador: 1992, 2007
  • Ethiopia: 1984, 1994, 2007
  • Fiji: 1966, 1976, 1986, 1996, 2007
  • France: 1962, 1968, 1975, 1982, 1990, 1999, 2006, 2011
  • Germany: 1970
  • Ghana: 1984, 2000, 2010
  • Greece: 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001, 2011
  • Guinea: 1983, 1996
  • Haiti: 1971, 1982, 2003
  • Hungary: 1970, 1980, 1990, 2001, 2011
  • India: 1983, 1987, 1993, 1999, 2004, 2009
  • Indonesia: 1971, 1976, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010
  • Iran: 2006, 2011
  • Iraq: 1997
  • Ireland: 1971, 1979, 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996, 2002, 2006, 2011
  • Israel: 1972, 1983, 1995
  • Italy: 2001
  • Jamaica: 1982, 1991, 2001
  • Jordan: 2004
  • Kenya: 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009
  • Kyrgyz Republic: 1999, 2009
  • Liberia: 1974, 2008
  • Malawi: 1987, 1998, 2008
  • Malaysia: 1970, 1980, 1991, 2000
  • Mali: 1987, 1998, 2009
  • Mexico: 1960, 1970, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015
  • Mongolia: 1989, 2000
  • Morocco: 1982, 1994, 2004
  • Mozambique: 1997, 2007
  • Netherlands: 1960, 1971, 2001
  • Nicaragua: 1971, 1995, 2005
  • Nigeria: 2006-2010
  • Pakistan: 1973, 1981, 1998
  • Palestine: 1997, 2007
  • Panama: 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010
  • Paraguay: 1962, 1972, 1982, 1992, 2002
  • Peru: 1993, 2007
  • Philippines: 1990, 1995, 2000
  • Poland: 1978, 2002
  • Portugal: 1981, 1991, 2001, 2011
  • Puerto Rico: 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2010
  • Romania: 1977, 1992, 2002, 2011
  • Rwanda: 1991, 2002
  • Saint Lucia: 1980, 1991
  • Senegal: 1988, 2002
  • Sierra Leone: 2004
  • Slovenia: 2002
  • South Africa: 1996, 2001, 2007, 2011
  • South Sudan: 2008
  • Spain: 1981, 1991, 2001
  • Sudan: 2008
  • Switzerland: 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000
  • Tanzania: 1988, 2002, 2012
  • Thailand: 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000
  • Trinidad and Tobago: 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2011
  • Turkey: 1985, 1990, 2000
  • Uganda: 1991, 2002
  • United Kingdom: 1991, 2001
  • United States: 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2005, 2010
  • Uruguay: 1963, 1975, 1985, 1996, 2006, 2011
  • Venezuela: 1971, 1981, 1990, 2001
  • Vietnam: 1989, 1999, 2009
  • Zambia: 1990, 2000, 2010