If a part of the building is owned by an institution and the remaining part by an individual person, then the owner is the entity managing the majority of the building.
4. If the building is owned by a multi-plant company but only a given branch of the company manages it, then the name of the branch shall not be provided alone, but also preceded by the name of the company in question. The case concerns especially agricultural firms. The names "Agricultural workshop", "Ranch", "Gardening workshop", or "Production workshop" are not sufficient. The gardening workshop may be owned by the Local Gardening Company, and in such a case, in question number 3, the, for example "Provincial Beekeeping and Horticulture Company in S?upsk Sierpowo Orchard" or "Industrial and Agricultural Complex in Cz?uchowo Wyczechy Agricultural Workshop" shall be provided.
5. In the case of buildings owned by the Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Internal Affairs, and Ministry of Material Management, then it shall be considered to be a "governmental building".
6. If the building is owned by an individual person, then, aside from his or her name and first name, it shall be also specified if the building is at the disposal of local state administration body. Such information shall be provided only for regions, where local state administration bodies grant permits to occupy a given building or dwelling.
During the professional training, the census enumerators will be informed in what areas the said permits are granted by the aforementioned bodies.
In the case of the regions, to which the rule does not apply, the "NO" answer shall be provided to that question.
7. There may be some difficulties in specifying the personal data of the entity managing the building. The situation especially concerns buildings which have been sold without issuing a notarial act in any form. If there is a justified assumption that a given person is the owner of the building, than his or her personal data shall be provided ,with an additional annotation that the answer shall not be lawfully binding.
8. If a farmer given away the agricultural facilities in return for an allowance, but basing on the free lodging act he occupies the part with habitable spaces, the institution having he right of ownership shall be considered the owner of the building rather than the farmer himself.
9. In the case of buildings managed by churches and religious organizations the left part concerning ownership by companies shall be filled in.